Race Discrimination
A Single Instance Of Harassment Can Be Enough To Constitute A Hostile Work Environment
Despite improvements in race relations over the last several decades, many instances of racism still exist in the workplace. Two different federal laws exist that protect against race discrimination in the workplace – Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1981. Title VII prohibits employers from taking race into…
Read MoreMan Called “Borat” Can Bring A Claim For National Origin And Race Discrimination
A man who was repeatedly subjected to name-calling could bring a claim for racial and national origin discrimination. According to a federal judge in Zayadeen v. Abbott Molecular, Inc., a Jordanian-American man who was routinely called “Borat” and otherwise mocked because of his heritage could bring a claim of discrimination under the “hostile work environment” theory…
Read MoreRepeated Racial Slurs And Threatening Behavior Constitute Race Harassment
Unfortunately race discrimination in the work place continues to exist well into the 21st Century despite efforts to improve the working conditions for all employees. In order to help get rid of racism in the workplace, lawmakers enacted federal labor laws, including Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act to rid the workplace from…
Read MoreRace Discrimination Lawsuit Allowed Under Cat’s Paw Theory
An African American was allowed to continue her race discrimination lawsuit, which also included claims of harassment and retaliation based on a legal theory called “cat’s paw”. The cat’s paw theory includes those situations where a co-worker, supervisor or other employee influences or a boss to fire someone or take other negative employment actions against…
Read MoreAfrican American Worker Can Bring Discrimination Lawsuit Based On “Cat’s Paw” Doctrine
One question that comes up a lot in race discrimination cases is “Can I file a lawsuit against my employer for discriminatory actions of a co-worker?” For example, sometime a supervisor or other co-worker may file a complaint against you or harass you just because of your skin color, your religion or your sex. In…
Read MoreUPS Driver May Maintain Racial Harassment Case After Co-workers Left Banana Peels In His Truck
Although what constitutes actions that are “enough” to show racial harassment isn’t set is stone – case law provides some guidance. In some situations the harassment is obvious – such as a noose in the workplace. Other times case law finds racial discrimination exists because of subtle practices that tend to screen out minority applicants…
Read MoreDemotion Without Job Description Considered Constructive Discharge
Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act prohibits employers from discriminating against their employees “because of” their race or color. This means that an employer may not take your race or color into consideration when making employment decisions, and taking an “adverse action” because of your race may be a violation of federal employment discrimination laws.…
Read MoreWho Is A Supervisor? Supreme Court Seeks Guidance In Race Harassment Case
A recent racial harassment case argued before the U.S. Supreme Court, Vance v. Ball State University, raises a significant question, “Who is a supervisor?” Determining whether a someone at work is a supervisor or not has serious consequences in terms of liability. In many instances, if a co-worker is also considered “a supervisor,” then an employer may be…
Read MoreResidents Only Requirements May Constitute Race Discrimination – NAACP v. North Hudson Reg’l Fire & Rescue
Hiring requirements – such as English only rules, passing a test or living in a certain area- may be considered racial discrimination depending on the circumstances. In a recent case, the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals determined that a Regional Fire and Rescue squad that had a rule stating that only residents could be hired as…
Read MoreBuckley Bala Wilson Mew LLP Victorious In Reverse Race Discrimination Case. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals Determines Employees May Always Bring A Claim for Discrimination Where Circumstantial Evidence Of Discriminatory Intent Exists
In a recent 11th Circuit Court of Appeals opinion, Mitten v. Lockheed – Martin Aeronautics, the Appellate Court determined that an employee may bring a claim for relief where sufficient circumstantial evidence exists of racial discrimination. It is not necessary to show that another person in the same job position was treated more favorably in order to…
Read More