Man Called “Borat” Can Bring A Claim For National Origin And Race Discrimination

A man who was repeatedly subjected to name-calling could bring a claim for racial and national origin discrimination. According to a federal judge in Zayadeen v. Abbott Molecular, Inc., a Jordanian-American man who was routinely called “Borat” and otherwise mocked because of his heritage could bring a claim of discrimination under the “hostile work environment” theory…

Read More

Race Discrimination Lawsuit Allowed Under Cat’s Paw Theory

An African American was allowed to continue her race discrimination lawsuit, which also included claims of harassment and retaliation based on a legal theory called “cat’s paw”. The cat’s paw theory includes those situations where a co-worker, supervisor or other employee influences or a boss to fire someone or take other negative employment actions against…

Read More

UPS Driver May Maintain Racial Harassment Case After Co-workers Left Banana Peels In His Truck

Although what constitutes actions that are “enough” to show racial harassment isn’t set is stone – case law provides some guidance. In some situations the harassment is obvious – such as a noose in the workplace. Other times case law finds racial discrimination exists because of subtle practices that tend to screen out minority applicants…

Read More

Demotion Without Job Description Considered Constructive Discharge

Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act prohibits employers from discriminating against their employees “because of” their race or color. This means that an employer may not take your race or color into consideration when making employment decisions, and taking an “adverse action” because of your race may be a violation of federal employment discrimination laws.…

Read More

Who Is A Supervisor? Supreme Court Seeks Guidance In Race Harassment Case

A recent racial harassment case argued before the U.S. Supreme Court, Vance v. Ball State University, raises a significant question, “Who is a supervisor?” Determining whether a someone at work is a supervisor or not has serious consequences in terms of liability. In many instances, if a co-worker is also considered “a supervisor,” then an employer may be…

Read More

Residents Only Requirements May Constitute Race Discrimination – NAACP v. North Hudson Reg’l Fire & Rescue

Hiring requirements – such as English only rules, passing a test or living in a certain area- may be considered racial discrimination depending on the circumstances. In a recent case, the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals determined that a Regional Fire and Rescue squad that had a rule stating that only residents could be hired as…

Read More

Buckley Bala Wilson Mew LLP Victorious In Reverse Race Discrimination Case. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals Determines Employees May Always Bring A Claim for Discrimination Where Circumstantial Evidence Of Discriminatory Intent Exists

In a recent 11th Circuit Court of Appeals opinion, Mitten v. Lockheed – Martin Aeronautics, the Appellate Court determined that an employee may bring a claim for relief where sufficient circumstantial evidence exists of racial discrimination. It is not necessary to show that another person in the same job position was treated more favorably in order to…

Read More